Site icon Money & Markets, LLC

Adjusted Unemployment Numbers Aren’t “Fake News”

investor sentiment inflation home prices gold vs. stocks zombie companies tax receipts TIPS bonds U.S. debt unemployment housing market unemployment Joe Biden stimulus consumer spending palladium Treasurys recovery Sherman Ratio bonds Treasury bond palladium futures junk bonds investing in China k-shaped recovery Biden fracking ban Robinhood economy negative yield bonds Yellen unemployment consumer confidence recession platinum gold debt COVID-19 natural gas shipping cost home prices unemployment durable goods home prices Paul Singer leverage bitcoin mortgage rates retail vaccine stimulus gold GLD yields Japanese bonds bond market commodities market bubble vehicle miles pets afghanistan withdrawal home prices inflation expectations chip shortage employment economics roaring 20s the fed inflation balance sheet money velocity mortgage rates the fed used cars inflation shipping costs Biden's approval student loans China's labor crisis low inventory employment SPACs inflation hedge employment data energy price real estate Fed rate hikes Russia-Ukraine traders China Russia Fed interest rate hike real interest rates Paul Volcker

When the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the latest weekly report on new claims for unemployment insurance, skeptics screamed “fake news.”

Headlines like, “Initial jobless claims fall, but drop tied to change in statistical method” appeared on financial news sites. Many analysts said the data is not directly comparable to past data.

The implication is that government economists changed the process to make the data look better.

Even if true, the change was technical. And historical data shows change was needed.

The chart below shows recent trends in seasonal adjustments. The blue line is the difference between the seasonally adjusted number and the raw data. Since the last recession ended, there has been a clear trend with lower highs in the difference every year and higher lows.

Unemployment Seasonal Trends

This chart shows data through August 2019 to avoid the large spike in unemployment caused by the economic shutdown earlier this year.

The trend in the chart is persistent over years. And it shows a change to the seasonal adjustment process was needed.

Adjusted data raises concerns for many. But adjustments are needed because the data fluctuates season-to-season.

As an example, in most years, there would be a larger than average number of people hired in early September. There’s a simple reason for that. Teachers and support staff are hired as schools reopen.

In a normal year, many of those new hires are the same people who filed new claims in June when school started summer breaks. Another spike occurs during the holidays when retailers and delivery companies hire and then lay off hundreds of thousands.

Seasonal adjustments are necessary. And the process in use since the last recession needed to be updated.

There is no conspiracy. There is just better data.

Michael Carr is a Chartered Market Technician for Banyan Hill Publishing and the Editor of One Trade, Peak Velocity Trader and Precision Profits. He teaches technical analysis and quantitative technical analysis at New York Institute of Finance. Mr. Carr also is the former editor of the CMT Association newsletter Technically Speaking.

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelCarrGuru.

Exit mobile version